Student Health and the Handbook

With the school year getting underway, now is the time many families are becoming better acquainted with the student handbook. What should this all-important document, which reflects the school’s culture, contain? As an attorney familiar with these issues, I see a lot of variety in the language in student handbooks––some that stands out and other areas where schools might want to consider focusing more attention, particularly in relation to student health and well-being.

Concussions and Other Injuries 

By now, schools recognize the danger of concussions, and most handbooks we review at my law firm include robust policies that address concussion prevention, management, and clearances for permitting return to play and study. One area receiving less attention is the other stressors that athletics have on developing bodies, with young student athletes expected to participate both in school and external club teams to enhance their chances of being recruited or admitted by a university.
 
Independent schools can play a part in helping reduce “overuse injuries” by sticking to the traditional seasonal approach to athletics (for example, field hockey in the fall, squash in the winter, softball in the spring), as moving the body in a variety of ways can mitigate against harm done by repetitive motion. Athletic trainers and coaches need to understand which types of exercises are a good match for the age of the student and should enforce rest days. Schools can also discourage allowing students to be absent from school physical education programs so they can participate in external club teams or other specialized training, except for the (usually rare) instances where a young athlete is exceptionally talented.

No doubt students and parents will resist such restrictions, feeling pressure to do whatever it takes to succeed in youth sports. Independent schools can help families set realistic expectations and refocus the discussion––and policy––on what is in the best interest of a developing athlete’s overall wellbeing.

Dress Codes

Whether motivated by an effort to be more inclusive, a heightened awareness of gender fluidity on campus, or because state law prohibits discrimination or bullying based on gender identity, many independent schools are looking for ways to increase the comfort level of all students. Some schools still divide the code into boys’ and girls’ sections, but others simply state that all students should avoid wearing clothes that are sexually revealing, need to be laundered, or that advertise illegal activity for minors (drinking and drug use, for example). Some still refer to skirt length and that tops with spaghetti straps should be avoided, but those guidelines are now often applicable to students regardless of how they identify on the gender spectrum.

Dress code policies also affect athletic departments. Some recent examples illustrate how policies apparently aimed at modesty and appropriateness have the inadvertent result of body-shaming athletes, particularly females. For example, at the beginning of the school year, an accomplished high school swimmer was disqualified from a competition because her one-piece, standard-issue, racer-back swimsuit had crept up on her during competition, exposing too much of her backside. The student’s victory in the race was reinstated, and the story has raised awareness about the “reality of how modern swimsuits fit the physique of high-level athletes when they’re performing,” according to a September 2019 CNN article.
 
Last year, a high school senior from California expressed her frustration with her school’s justifications for discouraging girls on the cross-country team from running in just a sports bra, even on hot days. In an article for her school newspaper, The Lancer, a young woman rejected her coach’s reliance on a modesty argument, and asserted that not permitting girls to train in sports bras only, “conveys to the girls on the team that their bodies are inherently more shameful than the bodies of the boys on the team. It is reinforcing the idea that girls should give up their rights to equal treatment to account for the immature response specific boys have to women’s bodies.”   
 
Independent schools need to evaluate what is right for their culture when it comes to the dress code, both on and off the field.  These examples, however, will hopefully challenge athletic directors and deans of students to reexamine the assumptions that have historically been woven into the fabric of school policies addressing attire. (Count the puns, I dare you!)

Sex, Sexuality, and Consent

If you think sports bras are a controversial topic, how to address adolescents and sex provokes even more discussion and, understandably so, given the serious consequences—from physical harm to criminal charges—that may result from an encounter gone wrong or that should never have happened in the first place.
 
Student handbooks range from not addressing this topic at all to detailing relevant state statutes that cover the age of consent; in states with “Romeo and Juliet” or “close in age” exceptions to statutory rape laws, some handbook policies also make clear when consent can never be granted (such as when a student is asleep or otherwise mentally or physically incapacitated, whether due to alcohol, drugs, or some other condition). Virtually all handbooks that include a section on intimacy indicate that such conduct between students is not condoned on school campuses or at school-sponsored events, but policies also recognize that for many teenagers, it may be developmentally appropriate—or at least inevitable—for students to experiment with levels of intimacy. Some policies, particularly for boarding schools, suggest referrals to the student health center where students can obtain information about reproductive health. Another policy angle is to ban public displays of affection, as they may make other school community members feel uncomfortable.

Many independent schools were founded on religious traditions and an open discussion of sex or sexuality runs counter to the school’s ethos. And leaders might think publication of such a policy in a school handbook may draw undue attention to the subject. Schools with access to counselors, psychologists, and a school nurse may feel more at ease in addressing these topics, especially with input from trained professionals. The challenge in crafting such a policy is to recognize the realities of adolescence, while helping students set appropriate boundaries for themselves. It’s a lot to ask of a student handbook, but a well-drafted policy can help enhance student health and well-being.

The tone and content of the student handbook are indicators of how a school promotes student health and well-being. Updates to the student handbook are as much a matter of checking in on statutory and regulatory changes, as they are on polling community stakeholders, including students, parents, faculty, staff, and the board, about what makes sense for an independent school community today. These conversations may take time, but the resulting changes—or a decision to maintain a tradition—will then be informed by thorough analysis.

A previous version of this article appeared on McLane Middleton’s blog.

Click here for more legal news you can use from NAIS. 
Author
Picture of NAIS.Models.AuthorPreviewViewModel.
Susan E. Schorr

Susan E. Schorr is vice chair of McLane Middleton’s Education Law Practice Group.